We cannot display this gallery

Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Pdf

The European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2010 on the transparency and progress of the ACAC negotiations states that: “Following a leak of documents, the ACTA negotiations concern, among other things, the outstanding EU legislation on respect for intellectual property rights (COD/2005/0127 – Criminal measures to ensure respect for intellectual property rights (IPRED II) and the current `telecom package`, as well as current EU legislation on e-commerce and data protection.” The resolution adds that “the EU`s current efforts to harmonize ipY advertising enforcement measures should not be circumvented by trade negotiations that do not fall within the scope of normal EU decision-making processes.” In addition, the application of intellectual property rights, including intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks and copyrights, must be “so as not to impede innovation or competition, restrict restrictions on intellectual property rights and the protection of personal data, restrict the free flow of information or place an excessive burden on lawful trade.” [42] The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACAC) is an innovative initiative by major trading partners to strengthen the international legal framework to effectively combat the spread of counterfeiting on a commercial scale around the world. The agreement not only calls for a strong legal framework, but also includes innovative provisions to strengthen international cooperation and promote sound enforcement practices in intellectual property rights (IPR). Together, these provisions will help support U.S. jobs in innovative and creative industries against intellectual property theft. The signing of the EU and many of its member states has sparked widespread protests across Europe. The rapporteur of the European Parliament, Mr Kader Arif, has resigned. His successor, British MEP David Martin, has urged Parliament to reject ACTA: “The expected benefits of this international agreement will far outweigh the potential threats to civil liberties.” On 4 July 2012, the European Parliament rejected its compliant opinion and rejected it by 478 votes in person, 39 against and 165 abstentions. [10] [11] The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic at the University of Ottawa requested access to the Information Act to see the government`s position, but received only one document indicating the title of the agreement, with everything else obscured. [84] ACTA establishes the ACTA Committee in Article 36 as a separate governing body outside existing international institutions, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) or the United Nations. [26] [84] Regarding the reason for not pursuing ACTA on the G8, WTO, WIPO or other existing formal structures, the European Commission states that an independent agreement offers the greatest flexibility to “continue this project among the countries concerned”, while stating that “the accession and priorities of these organisations (G8, WTO and OMPO) are simply not the most conducive to this type of rupture.” [26] ACTA was first announced in May 2008, following the release of a discussion paper on WikiLeaks. [25] However, according to a commentary by the European Union, there was no draft at the time, but the document was a first point of view, since it had been circulated by some parties to the negotiations. [26] The leaks of details published in February 2009 showed Division 6 chapters, which was also included in the final text.

Call Us Today

(309) 264-3093